TY - GEN
T1 - Zero-cooling-energy-buildings in hot climates
T2 - 4th International Conference on Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature, ARC 2012
AU - Dietrich, Udo
AU - Calderon, Sofia
PY - 2012/1/1
Y1 - 2012/1/1
N2 - In an architectural master’s course we examined the chances to reach a Zero (Cooling)-Energy-Building for different (hot) climatic locations, deduced design rules and developed proposals for prototypical buildings. Firstly, the climate of each location was analysed, along with vernacular and best practice buildings. Thus, first design rules were developed taking the respective climate into consideration. Then a typical office with common use was chosen and adapted by defining facades, size and placement of windows, shading systems, ventilation strategies and construction techniques. Afterwards, this office was simulated (TRNSYS) and the resulting indoor temperatures assessed by EN 15251 naturally ventilated (\“Type Alpha”) and air conditioned (\“Type Beta”). It was examined, whether the first rules already lead to a good solution or the optimisation through simulations is the main key. In the three locations (Cape Town, Madrid and San Salvador) the ZCEB standard was achieved, both for Beta and Alpha buildings. In the Alpha buildings active cooling could be completely avoided by passive measures, whereas in Beta buildings cooling energy was needed. But for both building types an energy demand for heating, cooling, artificial light and ventilation is remaining. To reach a zero energy building it has to be covered by renewable energies which were gained from the surface of the building (PV) or its direct surrounding (e.g. geothermal energy). This sets (new) limits to the maximum number of floors and the minimal size of the estate leading to adapted rules for urban planning.
AB - In an architectural master’s course we examined the chances to reach a Zero (Cooling)-Energy-Building for different (hot) climatic locations, deduced design rules and developed proposals for prototypical buildings. Firstly, the climate of each location was analysed, along with vernacular and best practice buildings. Thus, first design rules were developed taking the respective climate into consideration. Then a typical office with common use was chosen and adapted by defining facades, size and placement of windows, shading systems, ventilation strategies and construction techniques. Afterwards, this office was simulated (TRNSYS) and the resulting indoor temperatures assessed by EN 15251 naturally ventilated (\“Type Alpha”) and air conditioned (\“Type Beta”). It was examined, whether the first rules already lead to a good solution or the optimisation through simulations is the main key. In the three locations (Cape Town, Madrid and San Salvador) the ZCEB standard was achieved, both for Beta and Alpha buildings. In the Alpha buildings active cooling could be completely avoided by passive measures, whereas in Beta buildings cooling energy was needed. But for both building types an energy demand for heating, cooling, artificial light and ventilation is remaining. To reach a zero energy building it has to be covered by renewable energies which were gained from the surface of the building (PV) or its direct surrounding (e.g. geothermal energy). This sets (new) limits to the maximum number of floors and the minimal size of the estate leading to adapted rules for urban planning.
KW - zero-energy-building
KW - teaching methods
KW - adaptive comfort models
KW - hot climates
KW - vernacular architecture
KW - building simulation
KW - design rules
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84871162545
U2 - 10.2495/ARC120321
DO - 10.2495/ARC120321
M3 - Conference Paper
SN - 9781845646141
T3 - WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
SP - 361
EP - 372
BT - Eco-Architecture IV
PB - WIT Press
Y2 - 1 January 2017 through 7 September 2012
ER -