Spatial policies for growth management in metropolitan regions. A comparison of U.S. American, Canadian and German approaches

Deborah Heinen*, Jörg Knieling

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Many metropolitan regions face concerns over sprawling de-velopment, increased costs of maintaining infrastructure, and loss of green space and farmland. Some metropolitan regions have intentionally created spatial policies to govern development patterns and manage growth within their region. This paper compares the spatial policies applied in three case studies: the Puget Sound region (Washington State, USA), Metro Vancouver region (British Columbia, Canada) and Stuttgart region (Baden-Württemberg, Germany). While all three regions share a vision that can broadly be summarised as transit-connected communities, each metropolitan planning organisation leverages a variety of spatial policies. Based on the unique planning cultures, various governmental actors take on different roles at the local, county, regional and state levels. This paper categorises and compares the multi-le-vel responsibilities for defining, mapping, and implementing spatial policies. With this focus, the paper provides an international comparative perspective on approaches, context, and contents of multi-level growth management.

Translated title of the contributionRaumplanerische Ansätze zum Siedlungsflächenmanagement in Metropolregionen. Ein Vergleich von Ansätzen in den USA, Kanada und Deutschland
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)678-693
Number of pages16
JournalRaumforschung und Raumordnung
Volume80
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Regional planning
  • growth management
  • multi-level governance
  • policy instruments
  • comparative research

Cite this