Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interrogating transition imaginaries: mapping present futures of urban (auto)mobilities

Tom Hawxwell*, Philipp Späth

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Given the contested nature of urban futures, we approach the term “transition” as a floating signifier to investigate imaginaries of transformation. Focusing on urban mobility transitions, we demonstrate the plurality of associations with a post-transition future. This perspective allows the identification of underlying tensions and incommensurabilities between competing visions of the future. Q method is applied to explore imagined mobility futures among professionals working on mobility and urban development in Hamburg. The results show that even among those directly engaged in mobility transitions in their day-to-day work, there are plural and often conflicting views on what such transitions can and should achieve. The research offers insights into the coordinating role of floating signifiers in processes of socio-technical change. While these signifiers perform an important coordinating function in the governance of socio-technical change, they are inherently susceptible to capture.
Original languageEnglish
Article number16
Number of pages19
JournalUrban Transformations
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Free Keywords

  • Futures contract
  • Vision
  • Plural
  • Function (biology)
  • Perspective (graphical)
  • Identification (biology)
  • Transition (genetics)
  • Nexus (standard)

Cite this