Abstract
In view of the relatively large energy consumption of national building stocks, many cities and municipalities start to prepare energetic building stock models to monitor energy efficiency and plan policies at city or regional scales. In many cases, data on individual buildings is not available. A usual approach to this is the "archetype" approach-classifying the building stock into energetic types (archetypes). This classification is usually based on non-energetic properties available in digital cadastres (construction type, year of construction etc.) and can be a large source of error. We present our research into the difficulties and pitfalls associated with such an approach using the city of Hamburg as an example. In the end, we compare the modelled estimates with consumption data at three different levels to evaluate model performance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 233-253 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Environmental and Climate Technologies |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 07 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- energetic archetypes
- UBEMs (Urban building energy models)
- urban heat demand
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver